Technology & Implementation8 min read
If you've been running Acoustiguide tours for years, the prospect of switching platforms can feel daunting. Your content is locked in, your staff knows the system, and visitors recognize the handheld devices. But contract renewals are an opportunity to ask hard questions: Is this the best investment? What am I really getting for the cost? Where's the platform headed?
This guide walks you through what happens when your Acoustiguide relationship ends—and how to make the transition without losing the work you've built.
Acoustiguide contracts typically run 3–5 years. When renewal comes up, you'll hear from Account Management with a new quote. If you don't renew, here's the reality: your content stays with Acoustiguide. You don't get the recording files or transcripts. You get a 30–90 day wind-down window where tours still function, then the service stops.
This isn't malice. It's the business model. Acoustiguide owns the infrastructure, the recordings, and the metadata. You own the tour concept—the stories, the narratives, the curatorial vision—but not the deliverable.
That's a meaningful distinction. A lot of museums discover this during migration. They assume they can export their content and move it wholesale. They can't. What you can extract is the intellectual property underneath: the scripts, the sequence, the tour flow.
If you have original recordings on file (scripts recorded before they went into Acoustiguide, or archived locally), that's your starting point. If you don't, you'll need to re-record or license new audio.
Before your contract ends, get systematic. You have one window to pull data.
What you can get:
How to get it:
The practical part: Create a spreadsheet. Every tour, every stop, every piece of metadata. This becomes your migration blueprint. Include:
This is tedious. Do it anyway. This document is worth more than the contract itself—it's your insurance policy against losing institutional knowledge.
When you're evaluating Acoustiguide alternatives, clarify the ownership story upfront.
With Acoustiguide:
With modern platforms:
This matters for long-term strategy. If you're thinking about diversifying delivery—audio-first podcasts, social clips, educational licensing—platform ownership is non-negotiable.
You have three levers when rebuilding audio content.
Option 1: Keep existing recordings If you have archive copies of your Acoustiguide audio, you can migrate them directly to a new platform. This is the fastest path. Verify the file format (usually MP3 or WAV) and metadata structure. Some platforms require specific encoding; get technical specs before you commit.
Option 2: Re-record new audio You keep the scripts and re-record with in-house talent, freelance narrators, or voice actors. This costs $500–$5,000 per tour depending on length and talent level. Upsides: you can add production polish, update outdated information, re-voice in multiple languages. Downside: time and cost. If your tours are complex or multilingual, this gets expensive fast.
Option 3: License existing content Some platforms (or content providers) let you license ready-made audio tours. This works if your museum fits a template. It doesn't work if your curatorial voice is distinctive.
Most migrations use a hybrid approach:
Here's a realistic migration schedule.
Months 1–2: Data extraction and planning Get everything out of Acoustiguide. Create your migration spreadsheet. Decide on your new platform. Kick off procurement if needed (3–4 week sales cycle).
Months 2–4: Platform setup and staff training New platform is provisioned. Your team gets trained on content management, tour configuration, analytics. Start with a pilot tour—a short, manageable experience you can iterate on fast.
Months 4–6: Content migration Move tours in batches. Test each one. Don't rush this. A broken tour is worse than a delayed tour.
Months 5–7: Parallel running (optional but recommended) Run both Acoustiguide and the new platform simultaneously. Visitors choose. This de-risks the cutover and gives you real-world feedback. Acoustiguide will charge for this. It's worth it.
Month 7: Cutover Sunset Acoustiguide. Shift all tours to the new platform. Monitor heavily for the first week.
Months 8–12: Post-launch optimization Tweak based on visitor data. Update outdated content. Plan phase 2 expansion.
So from "let's migrate" to "we're live on a new platform" is realistically 6–8 months for a medium-sized museum with 5–10 tours. Smaller migrations (1–2 tours) compress to 2–3 months. Larger deployments (50+ tours, multiple languages, complex logic) extend to 12+ months.
Acoustiguide has one workflow. Your new platform has a different one. That gap is where things break.
Before you cut over:
On the tour guide side: If your guides use handheld devices, they'll need retraining on the new interface. Budget a day for this. Make it hands-on. Have them lead actual visitors if possible.
Visitor-facing communication: Most visitors don't know or care what platform you're running. Some do. If you're a Acoustiguide loyal customer, announce the change early. Explain what's improving (better mobile, more languages, no rental hassle). Frame it as evolution, not crisis.
Acoustiguide is mature, stable, and good at what it does. It's also built on an older model: rental hardware, expensive licensing, content lock-in.
Modern platforms (including Musa) are built around different assumptions:
The trade-off: you're managing more. Acoustiguide handles everything. Modern platforms hand you the keys.
Can we use Acoustiguide content directly in another platform? Only if you have independent copies. If your audio is only in Acoustiguide's system, you'll need to migrate or re-record. Some platforms can import Acoustiguide-format metadata files if you extract them during the contract period. Get the technical specifications for your target platform and ask Acoustiguide about export formats before you sign off.
What if we want to keep some tours on Acoustiguide and move others? Feasible, but complicated. Acoustiguide typically bills the whole deployment. Partial migrations get negotiated case-by-case. It's cheaper to migrate everything at once. If you need to keep legacy tours, run both systems briefly during the overlap period.
How much does re-recording cost? Depends on scope. A single tour (10–20 stops) might cost $2,000–$5,000 for professional voice talent and editing. A full rebrand (50+ tours, multiple languages) can run $30,000–$100,000. Some museums do it in-house on a tighter budget. Quality varies. A pilot tells you what's realistic for your museum and audience.
What happens to visitor data when we switch? That depends on your contract with Acoustiguide and your new provider. Acoustiguide owns your analytics while they host you. When you leave, ask for a data export (session logs, stop-level plays, exit patterns). Your new provider should give you immediate access to your own analytics. Never accept a platform that doesn't let you export your own data.
A platform migration is a project, not a setting change. Budget 6–8 months, assign ownership, plan for re-recording, and don't underestimate training and communication.
The upside: you'll exit a vendor lock-in situation, own your content, and gain control over how your tours work. You'll know exactly what you're paying for and what you're getting in return.
If you're evaluating alternatives and want to talk through your specific situation—content volume, languages, visitor device preferences, timeline—we're here to help. Contact us and we can walk through a realistic migration plan for your museum.